RE: Experts jarred by court gay-parent comments

I sent this to the Tribune in response to a story in Sunday's paper, possibly lifted from the LA Times.

Dear Sir,

Your story, "Experts jarred by court gay-parenting comments," was conveniently focused only on those experts who disagreed with the justices and implied that there was universal consensus on the question at hand. Astonishingly, you didn't even mention the largest study ever of children raised by same-sex parents, Mark Regnerus' New Family Structures Study, which used double-blind methods and followed more than 3000 subjects over a long period of time. Regnerus' conclusions made headlines and remain controversial, but his methods remain unmatched in their rigor. I realize that your paper is supportive of changing the definition of marriage, but please have enough respect for your readers to give us both sides of the story.

Best Regards,

 I doubt they will print it, but it's hard to say nothing when you see a story botched so badly.